01/The index PSI · Monthly · October 2026

DeepTunisia research · 002 · Monthly index

Police Satisfaction Index

How people in Tunisia experience their police: trust, the job they do, fear, and what happens when they meet them. Measured every month, in the open.

Ongoing · collecting answers

––

Not collecting responses yet. The questions and the formula are published below.

If the state measures its citizens,
citizens can measure the state.

Answer the questions
T — Trust: raises the index
S — Service: raises it
G — Grip: lowers it
H — Harm: lowers it
This fills in once 100 answers have arrived, so that no small group can be picked out.
Each square is a slice of trust (across) and grip (up); the stronger its colour, the more people sit in it. Hover or tap a square to read it. The ring marks the average respondent.

02/Method

How the number is made

Every answer from 0 to 10 becomes a share of 1. Trust is the average of five questions. Service is how well the police do the job: four questions everyone answers, how the last contact was handled for those who had one, and good moments seen in person. Grip is the average of six more questions, and harm comes from what was done to you and to people close to you. The index adds trust, service, the absence of grip and the absence of harm, with equal weight, and scales the result to 100. The formula was published before the first response and is fixed by the instrument hash.

I = 100 · ( T + S + (1 − G) + (1 − H) ) / 4

T: trust · S: service (how well the job is done) · G: grip (fear, surveillance, unfreedom) · H: harm (abuse, direct and close)

A worked example

One invented respondent, taken through the formula.

Trust: the five trust answers, each out of 10
6 · 5 · 4 · 3 · 5T = 0.46
Service: four answers on the job, then the last contact and good moments
6 · 4 · 5 · 7↺, treated 4 and handled 3 out of 10, one good moment S = 0.43
Grip: the six grip answers, each out of 10
7 · 3↺ · 6 · 5 · 4 · 6 G = 0.58
Harm: what was done in contact with the police
Contact in the last 12 months, one of the listed harms, none for people closeH = 0.22
The index
100 · (0.46 + 0.43 + (1 − 0.58) + (1 − 0.22)) / 4 = 52

↺ Two questions count the other way: asking for money or favours, and the freedom to criticise. An answer of 3 on the second enters grip as 7.

From police state to guardian

  1. 0–20 Police state Distrusts the police, sees them fail at the job, feels watched and unfree, and has been harmed or knows people who were.
  2. 20–40 Coercive Mostly distrust and fear. The police are something to avoid, not someone to call.
  3. 40–60 Divided Mixed. Some trust, some fear, and service and experiences that cut both ways.
  4. 60–80 Accountable Broadly trusts the police, finds they do the job, and feels free around them.
  5. 80–100 Guardian The police are trusted, do the job well, are restrained and safe to approach.

03/The questions

Every question, every answer

Each strip shows how answers spread from 0 to 10. The stronger the colour, the more people gave that answer.

TTrust: raises the index

How much do you personally trust the police?

The police treat everyone equally, whoever they are and whoever they know.

If you were the victim of a theft, an assault or another crime, how comfortable would you feel going to the police?

When a police officer abuses their power, how likely is it that they will be held accountable?

Held accountable means, for example, being disciplined, dismissed or prosecuted.

In your view, the police mainly serve the interests of…

0 means they mainly protect those in power; 10 means they mainly serve ordinary citizens.

SService: raises it

Overall, how good a job do the police do where you live?

If you called the police in an emergency, how likely is it that they would come in time?

An emergency means, for example, a break-in, a fight or a road accident.

How well do the police deal with everyday crime where you live, such as theft and break-ins?

Where you live, how common is it for the police to ask for money or favours?

This asks what you believe happens around you, not only what happened to you.

Counts the other way: a higher answer lowers service.

Thinking of your most recent contact in the last 12 months, how were you treated?

Still thinking of that contact, how satisfied are you with how the police handled it?

Handled means what they did: for example, whether your problem was dealt with, or whether the stop was done properly.

In the last 12 months, have you yourself seen or experienced any of these? Choose all that apply.

Count only what you saw or lived in person, not what you saw online or heard about.

GGrip: lowers it

How worried are you about being stopped or held by the police without a reason?

Stopped means stopped in the street, on the road or at a checkpoint. Held means kept by the police, for example at a station.

How free do you feel to criticise the police in public or online?

Counts the other way: a higher answer lowers grip.

How closely do you think the police watch what ordinary people say, online or in private?

This asks what you believe, not what you know for certain.

How often do you stay away from places or gatherings because of the police?

How often do you hold back from posting or commenting online because of the police?

Posting includes comments, shares, and messages in public groups.

Where you live, the police can do whatever they want.

This asks whether, where you live, rules and the law hold the police back.

HHarm: lowers it

During any contact in the last 12 months, did any of these happen to you? Choose all that apply.

Nothing you tick here is linked to you. It is only counted together with everyone else's answers.

In the last 12 months, did any of these happen to someone close to you (family or friends) with the police? Choose all that apply.

Nothing you tick here is linked to you or to them. It is only counted together with everyone else's answers.

Then and now

Two questions published beside the index and never counted in it: how present the police feel compared with before 2011, and how trust has moved over the past year.

Compared with the years before 2011, how present are the police in daily life today? If you do not remember that time, choose "prefer not to answer".

Compared with a year ago, has your trust in the police changed?

04/Integrity

Integrity, in the open

Submissions per hour over the last three days, including the ones the rules excluded. A flood of answers shows here for everyone to see. A burst on its own is not proof of manipulation: it can have ordinary causes, and only the published rules ever set an answer aside.

−72hnow

05/Data and limits

Who runs this, and why you should not take our word for it

This study is run by DeepOntology Collective, as part of DeepTunisia, an open-source public-interest research project. It is not run by a named person, a party or a company, and you have no way to check who is behind a web page. So the page asks for no trust and shows you what can be checked instead. The questionnaire, its scoring, the rules for excluding answers and the code of this site are public in the project repository, and every change to them is a dated, attributable entry in its history. A change to a question changes its fingerprint, and each answer is stored against the fingerprint of the questionnaire its author saw, so everyone who answers a given version saw the same questions. The About page lists every funder with amount and purpose; at the time of writing the list is empty.

The answers are used for this index and for the open dataset described below. They are not sold, not given to any political party, and not passed to an advertising system. The index exists because Tunisia has no public, repeatable and checkable measure of how people live with the police: anyone can say it is fine or that it is not, and no one can recompute either claim. This page is meant to be the record that can be recomputed.

The counts are fixed in public as well. Every day, the number of answers received this month, withdrawn by their authors and replaced by an update, and a fingerprint of the answers stored, are written to a public ledger in the repository, where every entry is dated. A month cannot change after it ends, so when its answers are released, anyone can recompute the fingerprint and see whether a single answer was added, removed or altered since the night the month closed. The ledger cannot show that the answers came from real people. What is done about that, and where it stops, is set out below.

What is stored, and what is not

When you submit, one row is written. It holds your answers, the language you answered in, the kind of link you arrived through (reddit, youtube, instagram, facebook, x, another link, or none, never your account or the link itself), the questionnaire version you saw, the time you started and the time you submitted, a random receipt code, and, only if it applies, one word saying that the answer updates an earlier one or came from a browser that had already answered this month. That is all. The kind of link is never published for any answer. What is published from it is the share of answers that arrived through a shared link, the share that arrived through the single most-used kind of link, and what the index would be without it.

The questionnaire asks nothing about who you are: no age, no gender, no address. Its last question, which governorate you live in, is optional, and you can skip it or answer "prefer not to answer". If you answer it, only your region is ever published, and never for a group of fewer than 20 people.

No name, email address, phone number, account, IP address, browser fingerprint or device identifier is stored with your answers, and there is no field that could hold one. Your governorate is stored only if you choose to answer the last question, which is optional. The site itself sets no cookies and loads nothing from other companies. Cloudflare, which hosts the site, is the one exception. To protect the site from automated traffic, it runs a short check in your browser on every visit and sets a security cookie that lasts up to a year; it may also show a check to traffic it judges automated, and its human check is switched on only during an attack and says so on the page. The cookie holds none of your answers, and we do not read it.

Two things are kept in this browser instead of with your answers: the month you last answered, and your unfinished answers. Both stay on this device. The month itself is never sent; if this browser already answered this month, your next answer carries the one-word mark described above, so the page can show how many answers may come from the same person. Unfinished answers are kept until you submit or clear them with the button in the survey. If you open the survey again more than 24 hours after you last touched it, they are removed then. If you never come back, they stay on this device until you clear this site's data in your browser, so on a shared device press the clear button before you leave. They are never sent to anyone until you submit. The month you last answered is removed when you withdraw your answers from this browser.

Two things touch your connection without being stored with your answers. To stop one machine from flooding the survey, the server counts submissions per address using a fingerprint of the address, salted so that it changes every day, and deletes that fingerprint once its hour has passed and the next answer arrives; the address itself is never written down. The fingerprint is kept in a separate database that Cloudflare currently runs in eastern Europe, without the guarantee of staying inside the European Union that the database holding your answers has. And the site runs on Cloudflare, which, like any host, sees every connection and keeps its own security records. The server that receives your answers keeps no log of the requests it receives.

A third thing is outside our reach. As with any website, your internet provider and anyone watching your network can see that you visited this site. The site cannot prevent that. A VPN or Tor Browser hides the visit from your provider, and the answers you send are not tied to you either way.

Your receipt code is the only way to delete your answers. It works until the end of the month in which you answered. If you lose it, your answers can no longer be deleted, by you or by us, because nothing stored with them links them to you. The index is published once a month, and a month's figure never changes after it closes, so that month's answers are fixed from then on. Any data released later has regions instead of governorates, no date finer than the month and no receipt codes.

What the index can and cannot tell you

The index describes the people who answered. Anyone can take part, so the people who do are not a random sample of Tunisia: they are online, they found the link, and they chose to answer. The numbers are reported as "among respondents" for that reason, and they are never presented as the opinion of Tunisians in general.

It is called a satisfaction index, and part of it is a rating of the service: how well people think the police do the job, how their last contact was handled, and the good moments they saw in person. The number combines that with trust in the police, how free people feel around them, and what was done to them when they met them. Good moments raise the service score; they never cancel out abuse.

The first month, October 2026, is a partial month: the questionnaire opened on 23 October, and most of its answers are expected to come from the audience of the film that launched the index. It may not resemble a normal month, so the change from October to November may partly reflect who took part rather than a change in how people see the police.

The 95% interval shown beside each figure covers only the uncertainty that comes from the number of answers. It does not cover the difference between the people who chose to answer and everyone else, which can be much larger.

The checks against fake answers stop crude attempts: one machine sending many answers, a script racing through the questions, a crowd sent through one shared link. They do not stop a patient campaign by many people or many devices spread over many links, and nothing short of identifying people could. What this page does instead is make such a campaign hard to hide: submissions per hour, the share of answers from each kind of link, and answers that may repeat an earlier one are published as they arrive. If we find a campaign, we will say so on this page, mark the months it touched, and publish the index with and without the answers we believe it sent.

The index measures how people see and live with the police, not how the police behave. A low score is a finding about trust, service, fear and experience. It is not proof of misconduct, and a high score is not proof of its absence.

Where this study departs from the platform's own rules

DeepTunisia's research rules ask for things this study does not yet have, and they are listed here rather than hidden.

Results are shown live while answers come in. The platform's default is to show counts only until a study closes, because live numbers invite people to push them. To make pushing visible, every submission per hour and every exclusion is published live on this page.

The French and Arabic questions are interim translations prepared by the project and checked by it against the English, for meaning and for wording that does not lean towards one answer. No independent translator has reviewed them yet. They will be replaced by independent human translations, checked by back-translation, in a later version of the questionnaire.

Review status. No external ethics review and no external data-protection review have taken place. Reviewers are invited to examine the questionnaire, the code and the protections for participants, and we will publish and act on what they find. The code is open.

06/Take part

This number is made of answers. Without yours, it is incomplete.

Answer the questions

No name, no account and no address is stored with your answers.

The link opens this page, not your answers.

Do you work for the police or the National Guard?

Thank you for reading this far. This index is about how the public lives with the police, so please do not answer it: you would be grading your own homework. If you have a story you want to tell, write to us at contact@deeptunisia.org. Email is not anonymous, so if telling it could put you at risk, write from an address that is not tied to you.